StarBulletin.com
We've got everything in our Star * Classifieds
* Homes * Jobs * Cars * Shopping

Archive for the ‘In Politics’ Category

Stayin’ alive

Monday, August 17th, 2009

By B.J. Reyes

At the rate the industry is going, most of us will be shocked if newspapers survive over the next few years, let alone the next 25 years.

We at the S-B Political Radar blog have done our part to ensure that at least one copy of the paper survives over the next quarter century!

House Chief Clerk Patricia Mau-Shimizu was kind enough to let us include a copy of today’s paper in the time capsule her office is assembling for this week’s 50th Anniversary of Statehood celebration. Other items sealed in the time capsule include a photo of the 2009 freshman class of state representatives, copies of bills (including the state budget), business cards and other memorabilia.

Time Capsule
^^ Rep. Chris Lee with some of the items (including the Star-Bulletin) being placed in a time capsule.

Today
^^ Today’s front page (Aug. 17, 2009)

The 50th Anniversary of Statehood Commission is putting together 50 time capsules, including seven which are being made available for the public to contribute items. The rest are being distributed to neighbor islands and schools throughout the state.

Time capsules are schedule to be opened in 2034, on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of statehood, according to the Commission.

Governor’s spokesman Lenny Klompus says officials from the state archives will seal the capsules during a ceremony Friday, and the capsules will be buried before the end of the year.

Right to Life Targets Abercrombie Meetings

Friday, August 14th, 2009

By Richard Borreca

The anti-abortion organization, Hawaii Right to Life, is calling on supporters to attend two campaign rallies planned by Rep. Neil Abercrombie, who is running for governor in the 2010 Democratic primary.

The group mistakenly says “Abercrombie is having town hall meetings to allow Hawaii residents to discuss health-care reform.”

But the group in an Internet alert urges Right to Life members to attend.

“Please take the time to attend a meeting and let your voice be heard. You can be sure that abortion and euthanasia advocates will be present to counter any critics in attendance. Mr. Abercrombie needs to hear from pro-lifers loud and clear,” according to Right to Life.

Abercrombie campaign spokeswoman Laurie Au  said the meetings are organized by Abercrombie’s campaign not his congressional office.

“It is a mischaracterization to call these “Congressional Town Hall” meetings or to suggest that they are meetings to discuss the health insurance reform bills. Mr. Abercrombie’s Congressional office has held two forums that focused on health care issues on May 28 and July 1,” said Au.

But, she added that “we welcome discussion on any issue, including health care.”

The campaign rallies will be held  August 18 at Kipapa Elementary School cafeteria, 7:00 pm – 9:00 pm and Thursday, August 20 at Stevenson Middle School cafeteria, 5:30 pm – 7:30 pm.

Not exactly ‘in the pink’

Thursday, August 6th, 2009

By B.J. Reyes

Despite the graphic on the front page of our paper on Wednesday, layoff notices delivered to state workers this week were not actually pink slips. (At least not ALL of them.)

Not that a letter on standard white state stationery made it any easier for employees to accept the news.

An employee in the Department of Accounting and General Services shared her layoff notice with us.

Dated Aug. 4, from state Comptroller Russ Saito, it opens:

It is with sincere regret that I must inform you of a reduction-in-force that will result in abolishment of your position, Janitor II, Position No. ####, at the close of business on Friday, November 13, 2009. This was a very difficult decision made after evaluation of the entire operation of the Department of Accounting and General Services and determination of adjustments that have to be made in the best interests of the Department and the State.

Certainly not news that anyone wants to receive, but perhaps it’s better than being informed by a recorded message. (Story here)

Happy Birth(er)day!

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

By B.J. Reyes

COLB

While the mouthbreathers at WorldNetDaily will no doubt use today to trumpet their campaign for the release of the “long-form birth certificate,” it also seems like a good day for the Political Radar to bury this issue once and for all.

There is nothing we can say or report that will sway your opinion on this matter. You either believe that POTUS was born in Honolulu on this day 48 years ago (as attested to in the oft-posted Certificate of Live Birth), or you don’t.

You either believe Factcheck.org and services such as McClatchy Newspapers, or you believe that the Kenyan government is really in charge of the country and interpret as Gospel the words of Orly Taitz, Jerome Corsi and Lou Dobbs.

Henceforth, you will see no further mention of this issue in the Political Radar blog.

As far as we’re concerned, POTUS is a U.S. citizen.

Furthermore, this being a blog post and not a traditional news story, all submitted comments will be subject to the usual screening and may or may not be creatively edited.

Endorsement roundup

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

By B.J. Reyes

Here are some of the endorsements handed out in the City Council District 5 special election. (Candidates listed in alphabetical order.)

Nathaniel Kinney
Hawaii Building and Construction Trades Council
Hawaii Carpenters Union
Hawaii Government Employees Association
Hawaii Fire Fighters Association

Operating Engineers

United Food & Commercial Workers

Ann Kobayashi
Hawaii Women’s Political Caucus
International Longshore and Warehouse Union
Local 5
Sierra Club, Hawaii Chapter
State of Hawaii Organization of Police Officers

Matt Matsunaga
Hawaii Laborers’ Union
Honolulu Advertiser

Know of any others? E-mail us! bjreyes@starbulletin.com

Ballots for the special mail-in election have gone out already and absentee walk-in voting at Honolulu Hale begins tomorrow. Ballots must be in to the City Clerk’s Office by Aug. 7.

For profiles of all 14 candidates in the race, click here.

Sha-zaam!

Thursday, July 16th, 2009

By B.J. Reyes

UPDATE: 7/17/09

As it turns out, we did have photographic evidence of Jim Nabors’ visit to the governor’s office yesterday: Island Images.

>>>>> <<<<<

We have no photographic evidence, so you’ll just have to take our word for it that entertainer Jim Nabors was spotted in Gov. Linda Lingle’s office while she was holding a news conference with reporters.

Jim Nabors

Was he offering budget advice? Is he being vetted for an appointment in the administration?

Nah, the governor’s office says the Hawaii resident and eponymous “Gomer Pyle” actor was there to record a TV/radio spot for the “50 Voices of Statehood” project. The spots are being compiled by the 50th Anniversary of Statehood Commission.

Lingle on Union Talks

Monday, July 13th, 2009

By Richard Borreca

Here’s the transcript of Gov. Lingle’s media Q@A from this weekend:
Governor Lingle spoke to reporters on Saturday following an event she attended at Kapiolani Park.  The following is the transcript of her responses to their questions regarding union negotiations and vetoes.

Russell

Media Q&A Transcript
July 11, 2009
Kapiolani Park

Question: So, Governor, Monday is a big day with the unions?

Governor: It’s important to be clear on what is going to take place. Monday is a meeting that we asked the unions to come to – UPW and HGEA – the purpose of Monday is to discuss the furlough plan that the state has developed. After the judge ruled that we had to negotiate, we wrote to those unions and asked them, “Please come. The judge said we have to negotiate. The judge ruled. We’re likely to appeal that ruling, but in the meantime, let’s discuss furloughs so we have a plan in place.”

I continue to believe that furloughs are the right way to go. I’ve tried to avoid laying off our employees. Each month that goes by, our deficit gets more and more difficult to fill because we have fewer months to be able to have savings. So on Monday, the purpose of the meeting is to discuss furloughs.

I think the mayors have muddied up the issue a little bit in talking about negotiating contracts. Really the mayors aren’t a part of Monday. The purpose of the meetings is to negotiate furloughs.  It’s only the state that has the furlough plan. If the mayors want to come and sit and listen to the discussion, they’re welcome. The other unions are welcome. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the state’s furlough plan. We also told the unions that if they wanted to use the meeting as a time to pass across an on the record proposal on the overall contract that we would be happy to receive it at that time.

Question: What was your reaction when the mayors came in when the DOE and UH presented their proposal on Wednesday?

Governor: There is no proposal. They said they were just repeating what the unions had told them. There really is no proposal – there can’t be because you need to have the governor and one of the mayors in order to make a proposal. You need to have the university president, the head of the board of regents and governor to make a proposal.

The reason that the university professors still don’t have a proposal is that the university president and the board of regents have never come to me and said, “Here’s what we want to put across, do we have your support?” They’ve never come forth with a plan.

The DOE and BOE have developed a plan, they asked me if it would get my vote. And I signed off on it a week ago on Monday. So now HSTA has a formal proposal that the teachers at the Department of Education have also signed off on. It’s only the university professors now that don’t have a formal proposal. That’s simply because the university hasn’t come forward with a proposal yet.

Question: Do you have a list for the unions?

Governor: We are working on a list now. Again, we want to make certain that it’s – by list, you mean?  I’m sorry, maybe you should clarify your question.

Question: People who are going to be laid off?

Governor: We are working on developing a list of people we would have to lay off if we are not able to reach some agreement on our furlough plan or on the labor contracts. It is my hope – and it has always been my desire – to implement a furlough plan because I think it would have the least impact on the services and the employees themselves. Hopefully, we will be able to get into that negotiation on Monday about the furlough plan. I want to sit down with the unions, and if they have a better idea of how to implement the furlough plan, we’re happy to talk about that.

Question: Governor, did you send out the letters to start the layoff process last week?

Governor: No. The letter first has to go to the unions before it goes to the individual employees and that’s the letter we are working on now. We thought it made a lot more sense to see if Monday we get some good progress on our furlough plan. We don’t want to unnecessarily upset people but we want to be realistic at the same time. We’ll wait and see what happens on Monday. Hopefully we’ll have some good discussion about that furlough plan.

Question: The mayors are saying they are part of the mix because you have four votes and each of them have a vote to make up four.

Governor: It’s because furloughs are not part of the contract negotiation. As you know, we had a furlough plan. When the unions went to court and said “You can’t do that on your own, you need to negotiate.” The state is the only one with a furlough plan. The mayors are not part of that discussion because they are not recommending any furloughs of their employees. That’s why they are not part of this discussion.

Question: Do you feel overshadowed by the mayors?

Governor: No. I think the process is one that is very cumbersome. It’s not in the interest of the taxpayers. When I was a mayor, it was a difficult process to be on that side. Clearly the mayors and the counties should be negotiating separately. Their situation is different, their revenue sources are very different, the impacts are very different and the process just doesn’t work well for taxpayers.

Question: Do you think Mayor Hannemann is taking advantage of this situation because he is considering running for governor?

Governor: I would just say that I think the mayors have muddied the waters and made the negotiations more difficult for the state than they need to be. Hopefully we’ll get things back on track. I hope everyone understands what the purpose of Monday’s meeting is. Mayor Hannemann made it seem as if Monday was a big negotiating day; but in fact, Monday is happening because a formal letter that my team wrote to the unions – UPW and HGEA – and asked them to meet with us to discuss our furlough plan.

Question: unintelligible … about vetoes.

Governor: We’ve been trying to issue them (vetoes) in groups. The group that was issued yesterday was because they have a financial impact. They may be good ideas; but we wanted people to realize it wasn’t just commenting on the idea itself but the fact that we simply don’t have the money to pay for it right now.

I’m simply reacting the same way citizens across the state are, and that is to say that you can’t spend or start new programs when you don’t have any money.

An important point here – people have been asking how this happened. They say, “What happened to all the money?”

Well, we operate on projected revenues. So the money we’re talking about, the $2.8 billion wasn’t money we ever had, it was projected to be collected over the next two years and now the projection has changed. So it’s not as if the Legislature and I went out and spent money we had sitting in the bank. Our budget is based on projections for the next two years. When those projections get cut back, we have to cut back our expenses.

That’s why these negotiations with the unions – it’s not to go back and take money from them in the past; but going forward because the projection was downgraded and we simply don’t have the money to pay what they are earning now.

Question: Governor, you will be at that (Monday’s) meeting?

Governor: Marie (Laderta) will definitely be at that meeting.

Question: But you’re not?

Governor: I’m not planning to be here.

Question: As far as the arbitration with HGEA, I understand they have issues about selecting the person?

Governor: I think the mayors – again, because of a lack of experience – don’t understand the purpose of arbitration. We’ve put a name forward, a very good name, a very experienced person. They wrote back and said, “we don’t think that person would be a good negotiator.”

This is not to appoint a good negotiator. It’s to appoint a member of an arbitration panel to represent the taxpayers. The union gets one member, the taxpayers get one member and then they choose a third member. I think the mayors just don’t understand the purpose because they wrote back and said, “We don’t like that person as a negotiator.” They put another name forward who is an attorney at a local law firm who doesn’t know anything about our finances or anything abut state government and that is not a person you’d want on an arbitration panel. I think they just need to get a little more up to speed on what all the processes are because we really need to get going.

Question: How do you break that stalemate? Come up with another name?

Governor: This is the second name we’ve come up with, not the first. Again, they came up with another name that we didn’t feel was appropriate because, again, the people they’re coming up with don’t know anything about our current situation and that’s what you need on the arbitration panel.

You need someone who knows the facts and the background of our finances so they can pose questions to the other side during the arbitration period. We want the strongest person we can with the most knowledge of our government’s current financial situation. We suggested our Budget Director Georgina Kawamura would be the right person and the mayors said they don’t want her.

So again, there’s no one who knows the state situation any better. She’s also been a county budget director on Maui during my time as mayor for eight years. She knows the county and state. She’s the logical person to have on this panel. She represented us on previous arbitration panels. We thought it was a really good name to go forward. They want someone else who I’ve never heard of. It doesn’t make any sense. It’s not in the people’s interest. We really need to go forward.

Question: What is the deadline?

Governor: There’s a deadline for a last best offer in August. The arbitrations start in September.

Question: If furloughs don’t go through, you said you would take layoffs. Former Governor Cayetano said he wanted to layoff 1,400 and he couldn’t do it – only 150. Do you think you can do it?

Governor: Governor Cayetano is correct. It’s a very cumbersome, difficult process that favors the unions much more so than it favors the taxpayers and they’ve made it difficult for us to have any kind of labor savings or layoffs.

I think he really hit the nail on the head with his comments on how difficult it is. That’s part of the reason why I feel the furloughs are the better way to go because it’s savings you can realize right away. The fact that the layoff procedure is so difficult means you have to layoff very large numbers of people to get the savings you need. That’s why I continue to believe furloughs are the best approach.

Question: Anything to come out of Monday?

Governor: We’re hoping we can get agreement from UPW and HGEA on the furlough plan. That’s what we’re going to discuss.

Question: So, the mayors, when they talk about their meeting, is that different?

Governor: I don’t know what they’re talking about. They need to explain that to the public. The only meeting I know about is one we requested on Monday from a letter we sent to UPW and HGEA.

Question: Have you received a letter from them formally?

Governor: Yes. They are going to be there on Monday. We’ve said it’s for the furlough plan, but if they want to make an offer for the overall contract on the record, we will be there to receive that.

———————————————————————————————————
Russell Pang
Chief of Media Relations
Office of the Governor
Executive Chambers-State Capitol

Kobayashi Wins Early Endorsement

Friday, July 10th, 2009

By Richard Borreca

kobayashi

Former City Councilwoman Ann Kobayashi, who is running for her old Manoa-Palolo-Kapahulu seat, has been endorsed by the Hawaii Women’s Political Caucus, the local branch of the National Women’s Political Caucus.

Kobayashi, a former state legislator who ran unsuccessfully for mayor last year, gave up her council seat for the island-wide race. The special election held to fill the vacancy left by the death of Councilman Duke Bainum ends August 7.

“Ann is one of those rare lawmakers who manages to combine fiscal responsibility and budgetary restraint with an unwavering commitment to the health and well-being of all the diverse members of our community. Regardless of your age, gender, ethnicity or economic status, you know you can count on her to be fair and transparent in everything she does. We also felt it was important that she has always lived in the district she represents and will hit the ground running in  We also felt it was important that she has always lived in the district she represents and will hit the ground running in addressing their needs,” said HWPC president Faye Kennedy.

Did Lingle Blink?

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

By Richard Borreca

Late Thursday evening Gov. Linda Lingle issued the following statement.
For Immediate Release:  July 2, 2009

GOVERNOR LINGLE TO CONTINUE NEGOTIATIONS FOR LABOR SAVINGS; SEEKS ADDITIONAL CUTS FROM DEPARTMENTS

HONOLULU – Governor Linda Lingle said tonight that she and her cabinet will be working late into the night and through the weekend to plan the next steps following today’s court ruling on her furlough plan.

“Today’s decision by Judge Sakamoto did not change the state’s fiscal situation.  We still face at least a $730 million shortfall that will likely grow larger when year-end tax collections are finalized next week.  In addition, the shortfall could grow again when the Council on Revenues meets in September.  While we have already cut $2 billion in spending, the fact is we simply cannot afford the government we have now.

“We will be working on two tracks throughout the weekend to close the budget shortfall.  We will continue to negotiate labor contracts to achieve the savings we need to secure a balanced budget, as required by our constitution.  

“We also will be continuing to identify additional savings from all state departments.

“I continue to believe that we must approach this unprecedented fiscal challenge with a sense of shared sacrifice in the short-term, while remaining focused on our long-term economic future.”

####

For more information, contact:

Lenny Klompus
Senior Advisor – Communications
Phone: (808) 586-7708

Russell Pang
Chief of Media Relations
Phone: (808) 586-0043ess release:

Dan responds

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

By B.J. Reyes

Inouye

U.S. Sen. Dan Inouye is taking some heat from a story in today’s Washington Post.

The story details how Central Pacific Financial, which was founded in part by Inouye and “where he has invested the bulk of his personal wealth,” received $135 million in federal bailout money after a phone call from Inouye’s office.

From the story:

The bank, Central Pacific Financial, was an unlikely candidate for a program designed by the Treasury Department to bolster healthy banks. The firm’s losses were depleting its capital reserves. Its primary regulator, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., already had decided that it didn’t meet the criteria for receiving a favorable recommendation and had forwarded the application to a council that reviewed marginal cases, according to agency documents.

Two weeks after the inquiry from Inouye’s office, Central Pacific announced that the Treasury would inject $135 million. 

Inouye did not speak to the Post for its story, but issued a statement today saying his office did nothing more than leave a voicemail message inquiring whether the bank’s application for the funds under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) had been received.

The entire statement from Inouye released by his office:

“When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, several things happened almost automatically.  Japanese banks operating in the United States were closed and confiscated.  In Hawaii, as a result of the large number of immigrant Japanese who had come to Hawaii to work for the plantations, these closures caused many Japanese immigrants to lose their life’s savings.

“And throughout the war, if you wanted to do any banking business, you had to do it with the other banks that were available and many of these banks were not operating with immigrants in mind, so there were language difficulties and such. In addition, the political climate was bad. Japanese Americans were considered enemy aliens.

“So when the war ended — we, as war veterans, not bankers — decided to establish a bank to provide banking services to the Japanese immigrant community.  And that’s how we started.  The minimum share was $300, so it made it possible for everyone to buy shares.  It was not a big bank. Although I knew very little about finances, because I was one of the negotiators, I ended up as Secretary.  I bought the minimum amount because I could not afford buying more than the minimum. That is the history of my initial involvement with the Central Pacific Bank.

“Much more recently, at the time of the original TARP vote, the Secretary of the Treasury told us the United States faced a banking crisis that threatened our entire economy, and that the Congress had to take immediate action.  Based on his testimony and my belief that the nation did indeed face a potentially devastating blow to our banking system, I voted in support of TARP.  As a founding incorporator of Central Pacific Bank, before Hawaii was even a state, I continue to be very proud of my affiliation with the institution, even though that affiliation has been limited to that of a shareholder for many years.

“With regard to the phone call placed to the FDIC by one of my Legislative Assistants, I would note that the Legislative Assistant did not speak with anyone at the FDIC office, rather they simply left a voicemail message seeking to clarify whether Central Pacific Bank’s application for TARP funds had actually been received by the FDIC. Soon thereafter, Central Pacific Bank was notified that their application had been received, and that closed the matter.  This single phone call was the entire extent of my staff’s contact with regard to Central Pacific Bank, to any outside agency.

“I would conclude by stating that I supported the original TARP legislation including the procedures created in the legislation that were then used to decide which financial institutions would receive TARP funds.  Neither I nor my staff took any action that would undermine the independence of those procedures.”